On Mon 31 Mar 2008, Michael Biebl wrote: > > > In any case, using logrotate is cleaner than the old sysklogd way IMHO > > :-), although it was nice that sysklogd handled logfile names > > dynamically. > > If you need dynamic log files names, you could take a look at the > DynFile functionality.
Actually, I should have mentioned I meant in the log rotation scripts. > For the "standard" Debian log files, I guess it's reasonable to use > static names. Agreed. thanks, Paul Slootman -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
