On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 10:19:11AM +0100, Arthur de Jong wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-03-24 at 17:35 +1100, Alex Samad wrote: > > Arthur, is there anything missing in libnss-ldapd, that is in > > libnss-ldap (apart from bugs :) ). Is it a simple drop in replacement? > > nss-ldapd should be a drop-in replacement for nss_ldap in most > situations. If you install the package it should automatically pick up > the configuration options from nss_ldap as defaults. > > There are a number of differences from nss_ldap: > - different architecture (running deamon to do all lookups) > - configuration file syntax is slightly different and does not silently > ignore unrecognised options > > Also, nss-ldapd is missing some features: > - no attribute defaults and overrides > - SSL/TLS support is not thoroughly tested (starttls is reported to not > work) > - no support for nested groups > - SASL and Kerberos configuration is untested > - rootbinddn/rootbindpw support is disabled Hi Arthur
sent you a reply via email, not sure if this is the venue to discuss this. basically was wondering where is the best place to discus libnss-ldapd, should I just raise bug reports ? for example I had an issue with myldap_has_objectclass(): myldap_get_values() returned NULL which tracked down to myldap_has_objectclass in myldap.c and it uses a search of the attributes received from the initial search, instead of doing another lookup (less expensive), but I don't allow reads of objectlass, I do allow search ( I have since changed) > > -- > -- arthur - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://people.debian.org/~adejong -- -- "Border relations between Canada and Mexico have never been better." - George W. Bush 09/24/2001 in a press conference with Canadian Prime Minister Jean Chretien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
