On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 06:33:08PM +0100, Samuel Mimram wrote: > It would be nice if you could allow the Programming/OCaml section. There > are many OCaml libraries in Debian and having all their doc registered > in the same section would be useful.
Seconded. While we are at it, can the doc-base maintainer please comment on whether the sections Programming/Foo are appropriate for library documentation automatically generated by some literate programming tool (ocamldoc in our case, but more generally also javadoc, pydoc, ...). If it is not please point us to the appropriate sub-section. Many thanks in advance, Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what? [EMAIL PROTECTED],cs.unibo.it,debian.org} -<%>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/ (15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ? /\ All one has to do is hit the (15:57:15) Bac: no, la demo scema \/ right keys at the right time
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature