Hi Kel, Kel Modderman wrote: > Despite the presence of the popcon count, there is nothing to migrate, as > explained on this bug report. Unless I am missing some really big clue > there will be no problem with simply removing ndiswrapper-utils-1.1 from > the archive, other than the leaving of a package with no reverse dependencies > left.
ah. OK. As I do not use ndiswrapper, I cannot really tell if people using ndiswrapper 1.1 with etch would want to move to a newer ndiswrapper. I seemed odd to me that they would not, but I will yield to your expertise as the maintainer. Kind regards T. -- Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
