On Sat, 14 May 2005 07:21:53 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: >Please keep the bug number CC'ed to answers.
I considered it chatter / clarification not worthy of taking space in bugs.debian.org >Please note, besides this, that using XFS on testing, if you use it >along with 2.6 kernels, is not a recommended situation, if you keep >2.6.8 kernels shipped with sarge. On my own side, I had to upgrade the >kernel to 2.6.10 from unstable, because of a grave bug in XFS support >for 2.6.8 (no reference, sorry). Ah, thanks for helping me sleep well! We have this configuration on a number of servers with nadda issue at this time. Running both i386 and 686 2.6.8x kernels. Possibly do you mean bug 292290? How long have you been on the 2.6.10 kernel from unstable? Any side affects I should be aware of? Michael Lueck Lueck Data Systems http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
