Hi, On Sat, 2008-03-01 at 00:12 +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > Hi! > > I cannot clearly understand which is the reasoning behind the recent > severity downgrade of this bug. Here we have a package in main > including non-free icons (released under a Creative Commons v2.5 > license: which one, BTW?). > > Having a functional package in lenny may be a good goal to achieve, but > that does not make a serious Policy violation to vanish. Hence, I'm > not convinced that the right action is downgrading the severity: the > issue is claimed to be currently worked on, but that does not grant a > severity downgrade, AFAIK (maybe a lenny-ignore tag, but I'm not sure, > and it would anyway require release team approval, IIUC). > > Moreover the previously cited wiki page[1] that is supposed to keep > track of the progresses on this issue, does not seem to exist anymore. > Where was it moved to? > > [1] http://bmpx.beep-media-player.org/site/License_Cleanup_Icons > > > Disclaimers: IANADD, TINASOTODP. >
Either supply new icons or do not whine about this. Period. Both BMPx upstream and the author of the icons are cool with the current situation. William
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
