On ti, 2008-02-19 at 14:14 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > On Tuesday 19 February 2008 11:55, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > > On ti, 2008-02-19 at 11:23 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: > > > And as this isn't always right, I suggest to use a less strong wording. > > > "You should look at.." or "You could include". Or whatever. But _all_ > > > those patches should definitly _not_ be included. > > > > I concur, although I suggest that the wording could say that if the > > patch is inappropriate, the patch tag should be removed. > > I've changed the patch to replace "you should include it/them" with "consider > including it/them". > > Regarding Lars' remark: the ways to express that I can think of make the text > considerably longer and hence IMHO out of place in the PTS, which should be a > concise overview of a package, not a detailed instruction of what to do. :-)
Perhaps "The Bug Tracking System contains patches fixing 3 bugs, you should consider including or untagging them." then? Two additional words. :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
