On Sun, 13 Jan 2008, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > I'm a bit newbie on how the BTS works, and I didn't know mailing [EMAIL > PROTECTED] > didn't mailed the Reporter of the bug. I didn't even know the existence of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] I don't have a strong opinion yet on whether you should be > automatically CC'd whenever you comment on a bug, but at least the reporter > should always be CC'd IMHO. It doesn't make sense to report a bug and then go > and subscribe to it.
If you want every message that is sent to a bug, currently that means subscribing to the bug. It's known that the methods of subscribing to a bug and figuring out who gets what mail are suboptimal, and making them better is one of my goals. However, what won't change is that submitters will only be "guaranteed" to get messages which are sent to bugnum-submitter@ unless they have also subscribed to the bug. [Making it so -submitter means "make sure the submitter gets this once" and making it easier to subscribe to a bug at submission time is one of my goals.] Don Armstrong -- This can't be happening to me. I've got tenure. -- James Hynes _Publish and Perish_ http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
