tags 307588 pending thanks On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 13:59 +1000, Martin Schwenke wrote: > The patterns for udev are a bit too strict. In particular, they don't > match this sort of thing: > > May 4 12:10:34 localhost udev[5851]: configured rule in > '/etc/udev/rules.d/udev.rules[59]' applied, 'pcmC0D0c' becomes 'snd/%k' > May 4 12:10:34 localhost udev[5851]: creating device node > '/dev/snd/pcmC0D0c'
I've added the following rules to CVS, which match those messages:
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ udev\[[0-9]+\]: (creating|removing)
device node '/dev(/[[:alnum:]]+)+'$
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ udev\[[0-9]+\]: configured rule in
'[\./:[:alnum:]-]+\[[0-9]+\]' applied, (added
symlink )?'[[:alnum:]]+'( becomes '([[:alpha:]]+/)?%k')?$
Thanks for your report!
-j
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
