Reuben Thomas writes:

> The problem I noticed is that in the following text:
> 
> (http://foo.com/).
> 
> this URL is highlighted:
> 
> http://foo.com/)
> 
> which is unlikely to be right, yet omits a potentially valid
> character, ".". (I'm not sure whether parentheses, on the other hand,
> are legal.)
> 
> I'd suggest that trailing punctuation be ignored. This would help not
> only with this case, but a case like:
> 
> "See our site at http://www.foo.com/.";

Can you try this with 8.7-1? I was looking at the selection extension
and this seems partially fixed. In the first case,

http://foo.com/

is selected, and in the second (which is the same as before IIRC)

http://www.foo.com/.

I'm not sure what would be considered "right" there, but I'm inclined to
say that since . is a valid character in a URL it should be selected.

-- 
things change.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to