Christian Perrier wrote: > Would "it is recommended that all files..." be more suitable?
Aside from its use of the passive voice.. Is there something wrong with "It's best for all files.." ? (Maybe that's still technically in the passive voice, but it feels less detached from the action to me.) > > I am fond of my nice simple "store /etc in git", and I don't feel that > > it's a sentence fragement of the sort that it makes sense to reword. > > My description is not saying "[implicit package name here] storeS /etc > > in git". It's saying that if you want to store /etc in git, you've found > > the right package to do that. > > OK. I'm not entirely convinced but you have the last call on it as it > seems obvious that you took care to word it the way you feel it should > be. That, or I'm good at writing rationalisations. ;-) -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
