hi guys,
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 12:26:42AM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
> + O_RDWR | O_EXCL | O_NOFOLLOW,MYF(MY_WME))) < 0)
^^^ i think that's where the problem is.
is there any real risk in taking out the O_EXCL?
the O_NOFOLLOW should protect against any symlink attacks, so
i'm not sure why O_EXCL was also introduced.
sean
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
