hi sergei,

On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 10:03:56AM +0200, Sergei Golubchik wrote:
> No convincing reason.
> I felt like O_NOFOLLOW is not as universally portable as O_EXCL.
> That's why we also have in my_global.h (?):

thanks for following up on this.  i'll try building a new version with
a modified version of that patch and see how it does.


        sean

-- 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to