On 24/11/2007, Per Olofsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Christian Perrier wrote: > > Quoting Eddy Petri?or ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > >>> -Description: Standard system > >>> +Description: Command-line environment > >> I agree with Robert; I have been asked quite a few times by friends (while > >> installing, what is the difference between standard and desktop system). > >> This > >> change would make it a lot clearer what's what. > > > > I tend to agree. However, that could be "Standard command-line > > environment" or maybe even "Standard command-line-only environment" > > (but I don't like the pile of hyphens). > > Some of the packages in the standard seem to not be so "command-line-only" > oriented. For example, SELinux, openssh-client, NFS client, mime-support, > ispell, doc-debian, procmail, and so on. These could very well be used in a > GUI-only environment too.
Indeed, but that's what "standard ... environment" includes. Is there something terribly with "Standard console-only environment"/"Standard console environment"? To me, this does not appear to be opposed a "Graphical environment". What do people think? -- Regards, EddyP ============================================= "Imagination is more important than knowledge" A.Einstein -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
