The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to gmane.linux.debian.devel.boot as well.

On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 07:24:00 +0000, Christian Perrier
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:  

> Quoting Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):

>> > Any suggestions as to which an accurate description would be?
>> 
>> Description: A minimal, core operating environment "A minimal, core,
>> operating system, nominally installed by default, which can be added
>> upon to provide a more featureful and tailored operating system."

> I like that one, except maybe that it still doesn't really says that
> there will be nothing like a GUI installed. At the beginning of this
> thread, the point was saying that for most users, "a minimal operating
> system" is pretty likely to implicitely mean something with a GUI (
> whether they're wrong or not is not really relevant, indeed).

        I think the fact that we have no gui in standard is merely
 happenstance; X is huge and not minimal, at least from a old UNIX
 user's standpoint.

        In the future, as disk sizes and data transfer speeds increase,
 I can see us putting X (and, if one may dream, emacs) into the standard
 install -- and so, perhaps, the gui-ness or not should not be encoded
 into the description.

        On the other hand, since most people are not old unix hands, we
 should present a description that does what it needs to, for our
 current audience:

 Description: A minimal, (currently non-graphical) core operating environment
  This is the subset of Debian installed by default, which can be added 
   upon to provide a more featureful and tailored operating system.


        manoj
-- 
You will never amount to much. Munich Schoolmaster, to Albert Einstein,
age 10
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/>  
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to