Neil Williams wrote: > maybe retitle this one... yes
> > I don't see splitting a package out of debconf to deal with these issues > > as a very good way forward. #328498 tracks the transition to cdebconf, > > and we're really quite close, only a few inompatabilities and bugs need > > to be fixed before a version of cdebconf could be uploaded that > > conflicts with debconf and works without DEBCONF_USE_CDEBCONF being set. > > So does that remap /usr/share/debconf/confmodule > to /usr/share/cdebconf/confmodule or use a symlink ? DEBCONF_USE_CDEBCONF doesn't, the two files are close enough that cdebconf can use debconf's. A cdebconf that conflicted with debconf would ship its own version of the confmodule. -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
