Hi,

On Sun, 16.09.2007 at 13:05:49 -0400, Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 04:25:49PM +0200, you wrote:
> >The effect, apart from growing the file to an unspecified size (it came
> >out at 31G instead of 20)
> 
> Well, you told it to write 20000 1M blocks after seeking 10000 1M 
> blocks into the file. (That comes to 30G.) 

ok, then I misunderstood this - but that's not the core of the problem.
FWIW, I expected such a job to require about 1M RAM plus a bit for
loose change, but not the roughly 73M it actually took in the
beginning, when the machine was still responsive.

> >The computer in question is an AMD64 X2 machine with 2G RAM and a pair of 
> >250G
> >SATA2 disks, with everything except /boot inside an encrypted LVM partition
> >(I'm using dm_crypt).
> 
> Reiserfs by any chance?

No, I use ext3 exclusively. This is a raid 1 (md), on top of that one
encrypted volume group, on top of that several logical volumes which
contain one partition formatted as ext3 (a regular Etch install).


Best,
--Toni++




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to