Hi, Am Samstag, den 28.07.2007, 17:50 +0100 schrieb Colin Watson: > On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 03:33:24PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > > On Sat, 28 Jul 2007, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > > I’m just reading > > > > Bug marked as not fixed in version 6.6.1-2. > > > and I thought that it should rather say > > > > Bug not marked as fixed in version 6.6.1-2. > > > Which is what it’s doing. (I think). Maybe you want to change that. > > > > Well, it's really marking that it's not actually fixed in version > > 6.6.1-2; I wrote it that way because the command is actually notfixed, > > and because the way that sounds most "correct" (to me anyway): > > I agree with Don. "Bug not marked as fixed" means something different > and doesn't accurately describe what the command is doing. English word > order is significant at times. :-)
Then it’s doing something different that I thought it does. I used it to undo a „fixed in version 6.6.1-2“ which should not have been done in the first place, and judging from the bts web page on http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=423773 it really un-marked the bug as fixed (instead of marking is as not fixed, which I thought would be the “found” command). If I really mis-understood it: What is the correct way of undoing a wrongly marked as fixed version? Thanks, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
