I'm adding [EMAIL PROTECTED] manually for the last time. Sorry, but I refuse to continue this discussion untill you fix your mail headers, and include proper Cc and To information instead of these "undisclosed-recipients".
Thanks for your understanding On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 02:58:52AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Yes, just like with every other binary. Why is that a problem? > > I worked in a train and had no possibility to download further packages > like the source package and the grub-doc package. > So it is necessary that the information in the grub-disk package is > sufficient. > Which is absolutely not the case. > If the correct usage of grub-disk requires grub-doc it should be a dependency. > > > You don't use binaries to modify stuff, you use source code. For this iso > > image it's just the same as any other binary, like /usr/sbin/grub. > > This makes no sense! > > If I want to modify ONLY the ISO image > why should I compile the whole source package at all? > > I modified the existing ISO image because the content > of this package should work out of the box! > > Dr. Markus Waldeck > > -- Robert Millan My spam trap is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Note: this address is only intended for spam harvesters. Writing to it will get you added to my black list. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
