On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 02:17:04AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 11:18:53PM -0500, Ming Hua wrote: > > On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 03:45:39AM +1000, Harshula wrote: > > > > > What's the correct and quickest procedure for getting scim-m17n updated > > > to 0.2.2? > > > > I am not quite sure. Osamu is the maintainer, and I am not a DD, so the > > upload is up to him. Currently I see two ways: (1) You improve your > > 0.2.2 packaging and build/test in unstable, and ask Osamu to sponsor; > > (2) I put scim-m17n to a higher priority and update the current > > packaging to 0.2.2 (which was in my plan anyway, just probably not so > > urgent). I think Osamu's preference is the key here. > > I do not care who does what. Can you two work together?
I would love to work together with Harshula, that's the reason I am asking questions here instead of ignoring this bug. With what I have now, I can probably package 0.2.2 in two hours and send it to Osamu for upload. I am refraining from doing that, exactly because I don't want to discourage Harshula and want to make him the main maintainer of scim-m17n. > Since Ming is technically better than me, once Ming tells me it is good > to go, I will upload that one. > > For the long run, I really suggest Harshula to maintain this since he is > the real stakeholder, (Chinese and Japanese do not use this part.( I concur. I think it's very important for the maintainer to use the package on a daily basis. Ming 2007.05.25 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
