On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 11:21 +0200, Marcus Better wrote: > > We could also roll-back that rather gratuitious change for 0.22 > > (modifying most/all plugins) and keep on with the current library name > > (thoroughly testing things), as the binary-compatibility is said to be > > there. > > Update: It's not binary compatible. Here, for instance, is a clear ABI and > API > change: > http://www.opensync.org/changeset/1443#file4 > > Notice how osync_time_vtime2unix() gets an additional argument. This happened > between 0.19 and 0.20. > > So I guess the libs have to be renamed after all. > > What do you want to do, upload 0.22 or wait for 0.30?
Lets wait, less work and with the release just done theres no real panic. Is there any chance upstream can be convinced to address the format change for 0.30 ? a minimum of 770 users seems a big enough user base to be nice too ... -Rob -- GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
