> We could also roll-back that rather gratuitious change for 0.22 > (modifying most/all plugins) and keep on with the current library name > (thoroughly testing things), as the binary-compatibility is said to be > there.
Update: It's not binary compatible. Here, for instance, is a clear ABI and API change: http://www.opensync.org/changeset/1443#file4 Notice how osync_time_vtime2unix() gets an additional argument. This happened between 0.19 and 0.20. So I guess the libs have to be renamed after all. What do you want to do, upload 0.22 or wait for 0.30? Marcus
pgpKX9DgQGjjx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
