That could be the case. When I tried to add the patch to the source package, it told me that all hunks failed because it was already applied. Now I changed the "series" file in debian/patches to revert the patch and build the package again...
----- Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 5:41 PM > To: John Morrissey > Cc: Aurelien Jarno; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Pierre Habouzit; Uwe Schindler > Subject: Re: Bug#325600: closed by Aurelien Jarno (Closing bugs fixed in > unreleased version 2.4-1 of the glibc) > > > It might be - maybe that change is what broke it? > > I'll know later today / this weekend. > > ...tom > > On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 11:32:57 -0400, John Morrissey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 11:45:13AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > >> Could you please try this patch instead: > >> > > http://sources.redhat.com/cgi- > bin/cvsweb.cgi/libc/sysdeps/unix/alpha/sysdep.h.diff?r1=1.26&r2=1.26.2.1&c > vsroot=glibc > >> > >> It looks a lot better, and it's always easier to convince the release > >> managers to accept a patch if it has been accepted upstream first. > > > > Call me crazy, but it seems that this change is already in the upstream > > glibc tarball (glibc-2.3.6.ds1.tar.bz2) included with the 2.3.6.ds1-13 > > packaging for etch? > > > > john > > -- > > John Morrissey _o /\ ---- __o > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] _-< \_ / \ - -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
