It might be - maybe that change is what broke it? I'll know later today / this weekend.
...tom On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 11:32:57 -0400, John Morrissey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 11:45:13AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >> Could you please try this patch instead: >> > http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/libc/sysdeps/unix/alpha/sysdep.h.diff?r1=1.26&r2=1.26.2.1&cvsroot=glibc >> >> It looks a lot better, and it's always easier to convince the release >> managers to accept a patch if it has been accepted upstream first. > > Call me crazy, but it seems that this change is already in the upstream > glibc tarball (glibc-2.3.6.ds1.tar.bz2) included with the 2.3.6.ds1-13 > packaging for etch? > > john > -- > John Morrissey _o /\ ---- __o > [EMAIL PROTECTED] _-< \_ / \ - -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
