On Friday 30 March 2007 14:37, you wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 13:58 -0500, Ken Bloom wrote:
> [bts usertags]
>
> > I'm pretty sure that it used to support $EMAIL or $DEBEMAIL at some
> > point, and indeed it seems to still support $EMAIL.
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ bts --sendmail=/bin/cat usertags 1 =
> > From: Ken Bloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: usertagging 1
> > Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 13:56:19 -0500
> > X-BTS-Version: 2.10.2
> >
> > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2
> > usertags 1 =
>
> Having looked at this a little further, I have to admit to being
> confused.
>
> Using the exact command you quoted in your original report yields the
> following:
>
>         Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>         > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts
>         > version
>
>         2.10.2
>
>         > usertags 372608 =
>
>         Bug#372608: gs-esp launched by cupsys failes on cups PS test
>         pages : Error: /rangecheck in .installpagedevice
>         There were no usertags set.
>         Usertags are now: .
>
>         > usertags 403803 =
>
>         Bug#403803: pine: Please switch to gettext-based debconf
>         templates
>         There were no usertags set.
>         Usertags are now: .
>
>         > usertags 406784 =
>
>         Bug#406784: gs-esp: Fails with error on given PDF
>         There were no usertags set.
>         Usertags are now: .
>
>         End of message, stopping processing here.
>
>         Please contact me if you need assistance.
>
>         Debian bug tracking system administrator
>         (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
>
> which implies that bts is very much *not* ignoring the commands. In
> fact, your own test above shows that the e-mail is correctly
> generated. What exactly is the bug? :-)

I'm not sure what the bug is. If I knew, this bug would be tagged + 
patch.

It appears that I even get a syslog message that the message is sent, 
but nothing happens.

Mar 30 15:31:13 cat-in-the-hat sSMTP[7981]: Sent mail for 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (221 smtp102.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com) uid=1000 
username=bloom outbytes=609

So is the message getting lost in transit? or is bugs.debian.org 
silently dropping it?

--Ken

-- 
Ken Bloom. PhD candidate. Linguistic Cognition Laboratory.
Department of Computer Science. Illinois Institute of Technology.
http://www.iit.edu/~kbloom1/

Attachment: pgp2dvl446bm1.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to