On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 07:26:08PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 14:05 -0400, James Vega wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 05:16:25PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > > Or should we modify bts to use $DEBEMAIL or $EMAIL as the default user > > > if none is specified? > > > > I think in the case of bts, where you don't see the message before it's > > sent, we should require an explicit email address. Users can always > > create a shell alias/script if they frequently use bts usertags with a > > specific email address. > > We already fallback to $DEBEMAIL and $EMAIL for subscribe and > unsubscribe, and $DEBMAIL and $USER for the new claim / unclaim, fwiw.
Yeah, I read the question as whether or not to guess what the email was a la debchange instead of just falling back to environment variables the user has to set. Using $DEBEMAIL or $EMAIL seems fine. James -- GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
