"Davide G. M. Salvetti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>>> DK == David Kastrup [2007-3-4] > > DK> Well, I don't really see the need. A report such as the one > DK> required by Debian in a non-interactive way is quite uncommon, and > DK> it is quite easy to persuade reporter-submit-bug-report to not ask > DK> questions if I am not mistaken. > > Maybe you are right about the fact that it is uncommon. Frank, Andrea, > any comment?
Hm, I find that it is generally a good idea if anyone who distributes changed versions of Emacs or add-ons like AUCTeX would be able to build their custom bug reporting functions on top of the basic functions provided by upstream. Distributing changed version is for sure not uncommon, but probably most do not try to provide distribution- *and* package-specific bug reporting solutions. So we might be uncommon in this respect currently; but I find it an improvement that should be advocated more. Which would be easer, of course, if emacs provides the infrastructure. Regards, Frank -- Dr. Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
