Le Mercredi 30 Mars 2005 09:55, vous avez écrit : > > It would be better to judge if I would have access to the source > packages (*.tar.gz, *.dsc and *.diff.gz). > well everything is on the server ....
http://debian.dalibo.org/dists/sarge/main/binary-all/tinyerp-client_2.0.orig.tar.gz http://debian.dalibo.org/dists/sarge/main/binary-all/tinyerp-client_2.0-6.dsc http://debian.dalibo.org/dists/sarge/main/binary-all/tinyerp-client_2.0-6.diff.gz http://debian.dalibo.org/dists/sarge/main/binary-all/tinyerp-server_2.0.orig.tar.gz http://debian.dalibo.org/dists/sarge/main/binary-all/tinyerp-server_2.0-3.dsc http://debian.dalibo.org/dists/sarge/main/binary-all/tinyerp-server_2.0-3.diff.gz > > | * the '#!/usr/bin/python' is omitted in many .py files > > I think this is intentional: they are only used for importing them. > yes i did that just to squash a few lintian warnings. Furthermore it seems that lintian doesn't recognize '#!/usr/bin/python2.3' as a correct header and throws the 'python-script-but-no-python-dep' error tag. > > What did you do with pydot (seperate license)? That's a good question :)) It seems to me that this License is compatible with the GPL , but i'm not an expert... More generally we could have a very modular approach for tinyerp-server and build distinct packages for each add-on (account, base, crm, marketing, etc...) By the way i think we'll have to do so for the i18n files > > I thought more of actual co-maintainership [1] for both of the packages. > This is certainly preferable if you are not an official Debian Developer > (yet?) ... then you don't have to search for a sponsor :-) Sounds good to me :) I've already made several packages but never really tried to make them official ... I'm using debian for a longtime and now i want to get more involved in the community. So i'd be happy if you 're ok to be my sponsor :) By the way, there's no problem with me if you want to be the 'primary maintainer' bye damien
pgplRH08rU9Eb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
