-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Hi Damien
damien clochard wrote: | Le Mercredi 30 Mars 2005 09:55, vous avez écrit : | |>It would be better to judge if I would have access to the source |>packages (*.tar.gz, *.dsc and *.diff.gz). |> | | well everything is on the server .... | | http://debian.dalibo.org/dists/sarge/main/binary-all/tinyerp-client_2.0.orig.tar.gz | http://debian.dalibo.org/dists/sarge/main/binary-all/tinyerp-client_2.0-6.dsc | http://debian.dalibo.org/dists/sarge/main/binary-all/tinyerp-client_2.0-6.diff.gz | http://debian.dalibo.org/dists/sarge/main/binary-all/tinyerp-server_2.0.orig.tar.gz | http://debian.dalibo.org/dists/sarge/main/binary-all/tinyerp-server_2.0-3.dsc | http://debian.dalibo.org/dists/sarge/main/binary-all/tinyerp-server_2.0-3.diff.gz
Ok, I'll take a look at them earliest tomorrow afternoon (I'm in the middle of my final examinations).
|>| * the '#!/usr/bin/python' is omitted in many .py files |> |>I think this is intentional: they are only used for importing them. |> | | | yes i did that just to squash a few lintian warnings. | Furthermore it seems that lintian doesn't recognize '#!/usr/bin/python2.3' as | a correct header and throws the 'python-script-but-no-python-dep' error tag.
Most of this is solved by using dh_python (and {python:Depends}).|>What did you do with pydot (seperate license)? | | | That's a good question :)) | It seems to me that this License is compatible with the GPL , but i'm not an | expert...
Well, if it is GPL compatible, it still has to be mentioned separately in the copyright file...
| More generally we could have a very modular approach for tinyerp-server and | build distinct packages for each add-on (account, base, crm, marketing, | etc...) | By the way i think we'll have to do so for the i18n files
I think we have to contact upstream to work this out, but I still have to investigate how i18n is handled exactly at the moment.
|>I thought more of actual co-maintainership [1] for both of the packages. |>This is certainly preferable if you are not an official Debian Developer |>(yet?) ... then you don't have to search for a sponsor :-) | | | Sounds good to me :) | I've already made several packages but never really tried to make them | official ... I'm using debian for a longtime and now i want to get more | involved in the community. So i'd be happy if you 're ok to be my sponsor :) | By the way, there's no problem with me if you want to be the 'primary | maintainer'
Well, yes it is my intention to be your sponsor then (at least for tinyerp, maybe also other packages). Being the 'primary maintainer' isn't important IMO, maybe we could mention a mailinglist instead, we'll see.
Cheers
Luk -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCSqMa5UTeB5t8Mo0RAqHrAKCcWzL8Ewpgip4/vRUfqw6Vo1WWQQCfSzBH is1yalIbIBPTjlgZuAurIFM= =2hQv -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
