> where did that second public came from? we say on the first ls that the > public dir had nothing inside, now it seems a public exists inside and > inside that public we have the foo and the public.
Hmmm, indeed: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> ls -la ~/mnt total 16 drwxrwsr-x 3 bubulle bikinibottom 0 2007-02-28 21:59 . drwxr-xr-x 87 bubulle bubulle 8192 2007-03-01 20:30 .. -rw-rw-r-- 1 bubulle bikinibottom 38 2006-11-21 20:15 foo drwxrwsr-x 2 bubulle bikinibottom 0 2007-02-28 21:59 public [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> ls -la ~/mnt/public total 0 drwxrwsr-x 2 bubulle bikinibottom 0 2007-02-28 21:59 . drwxrwsr-x 3 bubulle bikinibottom 0 2007-02-28 21:59 .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> ls -la ~/mnt/public/public total 4 drwxrwsr-x 3 bubulle bikinibottom 0 2007-02-28 21:59 . drwxrwsr-x 2 bubulle bikinibottom 0 2007-02-28 21:59 .. -rw-rw-r-- 1 bubulle bikinibottom 38 2006-11-21 20:15 foo drwxrwsr-x 2 bubulle bikinibottom 0 2007-02-28 21:59 public [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> ls -la ~/mnt/public/public/public total 0 drwxrwsr-x 2 bubulle bikinibottom 0 2007-02-28 21:59 . drwxrwsr-x 3 bubulle bikinibottom 0 2007-02-28 21:59 .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> ls -la ~/mnt/public/public/public/public ls: /home/bubulle/mnt/public/public/public/public: Aucun fichier ou répertoire de ce type So, yes I confirm that weird behaviour
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
