On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 08:01:43PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 06:39:13PM +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 10:18:16PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > > Closing except if you have more consistent things to show. > > > > Could you first provide me with an URL of bugs handling? > > As I understood and practiced the BTS so far, the maintainer tries to > > reproduce the bug first. If there are problems in the bug report or > > missing information, he first asks the submitter to clarify, giving > > him hints what to check. While this investigation is in progress, the > > bug is marked "unreproducible". Once it becomes clear (if possible for > > both sides) that there is no bug, the non-bug gets closed, or tagged > > "wontfix" if the submitter still believes a bug to be there. Since I > > did not know how to reproduce the problem until I saw the first > > example, I asked you for advice. Maybe I am always wrong, as clearly > > shown by you in the second "example". But I did not even get a chance > > to reply or clarify.
it also seem your mail MX refuses my mails, because of some strange ipv6 error... and the bug is closed, that does not mean it can't be reopened. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O [EMAIL PROTECTED] OOO http://www.madism.org
pgpQxHdOn2KxV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
