On 9 Feb 2007, at 11:27 am, Stefan Hornburg (Racke) wrote:
Tim Cutts wrote:
Package: courier-mta
Version: 0.47-4sarge5
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: Appendix F
The prerm script of courier-mta does not remove two manpage
alternatives. The following patch corrects the problem:
--- courier-mta.prerm.orig 2007-02-09 10:24:09.896439231 +0000
+++ courier-mta.prerm 2007-02-09 10:27:47.419548587 +0000
@@ -20,6 +20,8 @@
if [ "$1" = "upgrade" -o "$1" = "remove" ]; then
for binary in lockmail preline; do
update-alternatives --remove $binary /usr/bin/$binary
+ update-alternatives --remove $binary.1 \
+ /usr/share/man/man1/$binary.courier.1.gz
done
fi
Thank you very much for your patch.
However, how do you justify the serious severity ? Appendix F says
nothing about a "must".
I checked with the release managers on #debian-release (I wasn't sure
myself, for precisely the reason you say) and was advised by Steve
Langasek that it should be 'serious'
Tim
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]