Hi, I don't consider this to be normal: I use Linux for work, I almost always save on FAT because I need to have dual-boot with Windows. And this is currently seriously impacting my productivity, as I never know if what I'm saving will have size 0 or "only" change its name. I also don't think that this is such an exotic setup, lots of people have dual-boot Windows/Linux with a shared partition formatted with FAT. As for loss of data: if I download something with size 0 and go travelling (it's my laptop), and find out that I don't have the data I need available, I consider this as being data loss, especially if it appears in front of the customer.
I don't want to start a severity-setting-war, but I would greatly appreciate to have the severity of this issue set higher (even better would be to have it fixed quickly :-> ). Thanks, Eric Mike Hommey said: > severity 407023 normal > thanks > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 02:19:36PM +0100, Eric Lavarde - Debian Bugs > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> severity 407023 critical >> thanks >> >> (severity changed as per my last bug report) > > Come on, this has nothing critical. It barely has a small impact for > people saving directly to FAT. > > Mike > > --
