Hi Sam, Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any plans for a bash-doc-nonfree? If you're not going to produce one > will you sponsor an upload for me? I think it is important to include > such important documentation in Debian. Can you briefly describe what's the added value of the missing documents, compared to the existing man page and some existing info documents? BTW, I don't think "minor" is the right severity for a bug in a doc package that registers and de-registers documentation that it does not ship. In particular, as soon as a bash-doc-nonfree packages was in the archive, deinstalling bash-doc would happily deregister the info file that's installed by the nonfree package, and affect its usablity. I'd choose something like "important". Regards, Frank -- Dr. Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
