On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 03:19:19PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Package: gnat-glade-doc > > Version: 3.15p-5 > > Severity: serious > > gnat-glade is at version 2006-3; should gnat-glade-doc be updated to > > match the gnat-glade version? Or should gnat-glade-doc be removed > > from testing before the etch release? > Of course it should be updated, but why do you think that this is a RC > bug and warrants removal of the doc package? > It's not too uncommon that a separate doc package doesn't match the main > package's version, but as long as the documentation is still somewhat > usefull, I would not regard this as RC. > I'm sure we'd have to open more RC bugs if this becomes the policy - > e.g. wmaker-usersguide-ps is such a package. The question is whether the documentation is sufficiently out-of-sync that it's better to let the user consult on-line docs from upstream than to present them with inaccurate docs in Debian. I don't know of any reason why this is the case here, but I don't use gnat at all; Matthias is listed as an uploader, so presumably he has a better idea than I do, so I'll defer to his judgement on whether this is RC. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
