severity 405874 wishlist thanks Steve Langasek writes: > The question is whether the documentation is sufficiently > out-of-sync that it's better to let the user consult on-line docs > from upstream than to present them with inaccurate docs in Debian. > I don't know of any reason why this is the case here, but I don't > use gnat at all; Matthias is listed as an uploader, so presumably he > has a better idea than I do, so I'll defer to his judgement on > whether this is RC.
I'm the maintainer and have assessed the changes in the documentation; there are minor editorial changes and a few additions, but nothing ground-breaking and certainly no risk of loss of life or data, or breach of confidentiality. Downgrading to wishlist. PS. The new version, not yet packaged, has > with the Invariant Sections being ``GNU Free Documentation License'', with the > Front-Cover Texts being > ``GLADE User's Guide / GNAT Library for Ada Distributed Environment'', > and with no Back-Cover Texts. Does that really qualify as non-free? -- Ludovic Brenta. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
