On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 08:04:14AM -0500, Brad Spengler wrote: > > Please reply to the bug, not directly to me. > > > > I don't see the point of working around the PaX check in glibc. The > > libraries aren't real likely to work if they really require executable > > stacks. File bugs on them, not on glibc. > > What do you propose be done then until all the apps in this list (and > more) are fixed: > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2005-March/msg00459.html
That's not much of a list; I'm not overly concerned. > I don't know how Debian handles large issues like this, but this is > something every package maintainer needs to be aware of quickly. > If Debian doesn't act soon, they'll be releasing many advisories of this > type: > http://www.linuxcompatible.org/story41890.html > and be getting many complaints from PaX users because their system is > now unusable. Guess what? Debian does not support PaX. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
