On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 09:44:26AM -0500, Brad Spengler wrote: > > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2005-March/msg00459.html > > > > That's not much of a list; I'm not overly concerned. > > > > > I don't know how Debian handles large issues like this, but this is > > > something every package maintainer needs to be aware of quickly. > > > If Debian doesn't act soon, they'll be releasing many advisories of this > > > type: > > > http://www.linuxcompatible.org/story41890.html > > > and be getting many complaints from PaX users because their system is > > > now unusable. > > > > Guess what? Debian does not support PaX.
Debian includes PaX, which is not necessarily the same thing. > Is there someone else that is more concerned with fixing problems than > being an asshole that I can talk to about this problem? If you aren't interested in being civil, I'm certainly not interested in helping you. You haven't given a convincing reason for glibc to change, only for the applications to be fixed. Have you filed bugs on the affected libraries? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
