Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 21:42 +0100, Frank Küster wrote: >> I think we can claim that this will solve the bug; it's not >> a nice solution, but I don't see any drawbacks unless someone expects to >> be able to copy the texdoctk from a Debian binary package and use it on >> a different system. > > That is indeed the only drawback. And I think we can readily ignore > that, even if some people don't understand that integrating a TeX > distribution into a Linux distribution requires some changes. BTW, I > think the changelog entry is not quite correct. This bug is not specific > to systems with both tetex and texlive packages installed. Even on a > pure tetex or pure texlive system currently no documentation in > TEXMFDIST is found. This might even warrant a medium urgency.
Are you sure? On my system, it works as long as /usr/share/texmf-texlive does not exist. It doesn't matter whether it contains anything, just creating the directory breaks texdoctk. But without it, it works (finds Fundamental/usrguide). Regards, Frank -- Dr. Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
