On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 13:31 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > > Steve Langasek suggested on IRC that mounting /dev/.static/dev with the > > -n option (which means the mount point won't be visible in /etc/mtab) > > might be an evil fix for this problem. I've verified that removing the > > line from mtab works as far as making df not report errors. Would this > > be acceptable to you, Marco?
If /dev/.static/dev is going to retain the permissions that it has then I see no reason to change anything. What is there to "fix"? [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ df Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/hda6 10082852 9121552 449112 96% / tmpfs 193424 16 193408 1% /dev/shm /dev/hda3 490496 14390 450780 4% /boot /dev/hda7 11191604 3489176 7133920 33% /usr df: `/dev/.static/dev': Permission denied none 10240 2652 7588 26% /dev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo df Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/hda6 10082852 9121556 449108 96% / tmpfs 193424 16 193408 1% /dev/shm /dev/hda3 490496 14390 450780 4% /boot /dev/hda7 11191604 3489176 7133920 33% /usr /dev 10082852 9121556 449108 96% /dev/.static/dev none 10240 2652 7588 26% /dev The printing of "Permission denied" seems fully appropriate. -- Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
