Alexander Schmehl wrote:
> Hi!
>
> * Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [061020 16:24]:
>
> > > PS: Forgot a small "nice to have" in the
> > > gui-apt-key-desktop-icon.patch: If you like the icon, you should add an
> > > 32 bit xpm version of it too, and add it to the menu file. Sorry, I can
> > > create a new patch if you like the icon.
> > Please provide the icon to include. I thought you knew me a little
> > bit... Graphics is not my major confession... :)
>
> Okay, here it is, as well as an other patch depending on the other two,
> adding the xpm :)
>
>
> Yours sincerely,
> Alexander
> diff -Nur ../gui-apt-key-0.1-mit-desktop-und-icon/debian/gui-apt-key.xpm
> ../gui-apt-key-0.1-mit-desktop-und-icon-2/debian/gui-apt-key.xpm
> --- ../gui-apt-key-0.1-mit-desktop-und-icon/debian/gui-apt-key.xpm
> 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
> +++ ../gui-apt-key-0.1-mit-desktop-und-icon-2/debian/gui-apt-key.xpm
> 2006-10-20 17:20:21.000000000 +0200
> @@ -0,0 +1,509 @@
> +/* XPM */
> +static char * gui_apt_key_xpm[] = {
> +"32 32 474 2",
Do I get this right? Does this graphic use something like 474
different colours? Shouldn't the icons use only as few graphics
as possible in order not to lock too many colours with menues
and stuff?
Regards,
Joey
--
If nothing changes, everything will remain the same. -- Barne's Law
Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
