On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 08:29:27AM +0100, =?UTF-8?Q? =C3=98ystein_?= =?UTF-8?Q?Gisn=C3=A5s ?= wrote: > package evolution > severity 364038 important > thanks
> This bug seems to be a corner case that doesn't happen very often. > Lowering to important. Anyone running into this problem, please > comment. I don't think that /frequency/ of data loss is a very good reason for downgrading a data loss bug to a non-RC severity. Are there other reasons for downgrading this bug, e.g., doubts as to whether the bug exists in the current version of the package, or the user must explicitly enable an option in the setup that's labelled "dangerous"? Is there any hope of simply *fixing* this bug for the release? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
