2006/10/29, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 08:29:27AM +0100, =?UTF-8?Q? =C3=98ystein_?=
=?UTF-8?Q?Gisn=C3=A5s ?= wrote:
> package evolution
> severity 364038 important
> thanks
> This bug seems to be a corner case that doesn't happen very often.
> Lowering to important. Anyone running into this problem, please
> comment.
I don't think that /frequency/ of data loss is a very good reason for
downgrading a data loss bug to a non-RC severity. Are there other reasons
for downgrading this bug, e.g., doubts as to whether the bug exists in the
current version of the package, or the user must explicitly enable an option
in the setup that's labelled "dangerous"?
Is there any hope of simply *fixing* this bug for the release?
It is completely reproducable. Data will only be lost if you have to
accounts, abort when asked for password for one of them and then move
email from one account to the other. The email will not be moved but
left in trash. With default settings trash is not deleted
automatically.
Of course I would prefer the bug to be fixed. I have asked the
upstream maintainer if he could give me some clues about the
relationship between unauthenticated and offline more, but no answer
so far. Also the bug has been open, grave and marked "help" for quite
some time. If you think it should be grave, I do not object.
-Øystein
