Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > You analyzed it completely right. Thanks for reporting. I will add a > dependency on texlive-base. This means that tetex people cannot use > texlive-lang-spanish, but so is life.
Yeah; to be honest, the restriction would no great loss, as texlive-lang-spanish is more or less redundant with tetex-base; I tried to install it merely because I nominally could. (I must admit to being something of a packrat.) > I will think about moving cathyph.tex into texlive-lang-spanish, where > it would make sense. This would help all of us, am I right? That really depends on whether anything relies on finding it in texlive-base. Simply tightening texlive-lang-spanish's dependencies should be safer, but still perfectly reasonable as far as I'm concerned. > Again, thanks a lot! Thanks for the quick response, and for all your work on various TeX-related packages; having maintained a large public TeX installation in the past, I truly appreciate the Debian team's work. (I'm afraid I don't have time to help aside from sending occasional bug reports, though.) -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
