Robert, On Monday 09 October 2006 05:37, Robert Millan wrote: > You might want to add -fno-inline-functions to CFLAGS as a workaround > (tested and known to work). Besides, I'm not sure if this also qualifies > as a gcc bug and should be reported separately. Could someone enlighten > me? :-)
Thanks for the report, not sure about the gcc aspects. > Ah, there's also this check I added to ensure 'i' will never be bigger than > the array size. Not that it was any useful because gcc was screwing our > stack, but you might like to apply it as well. > > diff -ur zaptel-1.2.9.1.dfsg.old/ztcfg.c zaptel-1.2.9.1.dfsg/ztcfg.c Will do.. Thanks keep the reports coming.. Mark -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
