Hi Alastair,
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 12:59:39PM +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote: > Hi Jimmy, > > Thanks, I saw that and am using gcc-3.3 at the moment. I will try to > enforce 3.3 in > the packaging (Depends: on gcc, then gcc-3.3 in the Makefiles, etc.) > > Regards > Alastair ---end quoted text--- I've been pulling updates from the svn repo and testing with building the package, and i've run across a build issue, i've been trying out in building the package in sarge with some packages installed from unstable, and it happyily fails to build due to a gcc error multiple definition of `__i686.get_pc_thunk.bx' sarge's gcc 3.3 version is 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-13), upon upgrading to gcc-3.3 in unstable/testing 3.3.6 (Debian 1:3.3.6-13), things happily build again. its probably not a bad idea to just stick in a >= 3.3.6-13 than version in the control file for gcc, at least it will stop people from trying to build a backport only to have it fail on the wrong compiler version. Jimmy. -- Jimmy Tang Trinity Centre for High Performance Computing, Lloyd Building, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland. http://www.tchpc.tcd.ie/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
