On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 10:40:18PM +0100, James Westby wrote:
> On (23/08/06 14:31), Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > We ant to request removal ASAP, however, there are 4 packages with
> > > binary dependencies, and so require a binNMU. Two of these require a
> > > sourceful upload however as they are not binNMU safe.
> > Which ones aren't binNMU-safe?
> uim-applet-gnome (#383040) and ggz-kde-games (no report as I have found
> it just now) I think, as they both use ${source-Version} to depend on
> their data.
> The binNMU safe ones are evolution-exchange and ggz-kde-client. I am
> unsure of how to proceed, as Andreas Metzler has been handling it up to
> now. Shall I email -release with a binNMU request for these two?
> Also I am have only checked i386 for binary dependencies, is there a way
> to ensure the same for all arches?
FWIW, this omits ggz-client-libs, which had the dependency on most archs but
not on i386. So ggz-kde-client probably can't be binNMUed until
ggz-client-libs is fixed first; since not all archs need binNMUs for
ggz-client-libs, that makes it inconvenient to do this with dep-waits, so
I'll probably wait a couple of days instead febofer trying to queue it.
And I think evolution-exchange was just NMUed, so no need for a binNMU there
either.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
