On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 10:40:18PM +0100, James Westby wrote: > > > We ant to request removal ASAP, however, there are 4 packages with > > > binary dependencies, and so require a binNMU. Two of these require a > > > sourceful upload however as they are not binNMU safe.
> > Which ones aren't binNMU-safe?
> uim-applet-gnome (#383040) and ggz-kde-games (no report as I have found
> it just now) I think, as they both use ${source-Version} to depend on
> their data.
> The binNMU safe ones are evolution-exchange and ggz-kde-client. I am
> unsure of how to proceed, as Andreas Metzler has been handling it up to
> now. Shall I email -release with a binNMU request for these two?
So conveniently, all of these packages have now had maintainer uploads in
the past few days, leaving only a handful of reverse-dependencies on
libgnutls11 on individual architectures (principally on m68k and arm, which
are the archs having trouble keeping up).
I would say it's time to file a bug against ftp.d.o to request libgnutls11's
removal.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
