On Tue, 6 Jan 2026 11:58:53 -0500 =?UTF-8?Q?Jeremy_B=C3=ADcha?=
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> There were 2 people that reported that bluez-obexd is broken without
> evolution-data-server, so adding the dependency made sense to me.
OK, but blueman depends on bluez-obexd, so when I want a GUI to manage
Bluetooth, it now requires evolution-data-server
>
> If the current bluez-obexd package is broken without
> evolution-data-server, then one thing we could do is add a separate
> bluez-obexd-eds binary package. That way GTK desktops can continue to
> benefit from the evolution-data-server integration, while the
> alternate bluez-obexd package returns to its Debian 12 style packaging
> without that integration.
This could be a solution, if eventually evolution-data-server is really
needed, as it was said that it might not be.
Have a nice day,
Adrien
