-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Control: severity -1 normal
On Sat, 2025-12-27 at 09:31 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > Hi Robert, > > thanks for the report. I agree the situation isn't optimal. I'll see about > backporting the relevant patch (which looks pretty small) and do a stable > upload for the next point release. I've looked at the thread and tried to look at images with and without smoothing, with and without rendering limit, in 0.13.3 vanilla and with the patch on top, and to be honest I'm not really convinced it's that much of an issue (at least with my own eyes on my own installation). If upstream changes things I'm fine to follow them but - - I'll wait for an upstream release to upload to unstable and let it migrate to testing - - Once that happens, I'll see if it's worth backporting the patch to the 0.13.3-1 version in Trixie and maybe ask for a stable upload. Meanwhile if it really bother you there's always the workaround not not limit rendering or not enable smoothing. Regards, - -- Yves-Alexis -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE8vi34Qgfo83x35gF3rYcyPpXRFsFAmlROmYACgkQ3rYcyPpX RFtDBwf9HOEOxGk1ILJU6iKMTNJm6ZarD2kXBBiFoK+3YMgzwhxSPzhMP/QDAwlc avDaOXOLpL+r8k/5mM0nzIgLi0wopS10al145gGlIU0iGWx9Onrn+WkpX8BVCufV wdadz3uyvWuOT6GfjSJnalVDKwEsQb7bIzA/Ws/ECHXQZFSahdFaKdmFuUwBntWL w0oeRkOl+n5LFjvjOHYeprk8S2LqOBhrHAnemltZ3dt2tJFCOJLs+LIqogNlUmwc 3EmODvr4UPcBpXKoiGZuEY4lhrNq3i/wh5xTd2CcN4uX9UqDd2oAn5pHr125yrsi edDY2THQH2MReepEPFzoWKqPxqNAAw== =1gI/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
